Hi,
It appears your arguments are because you don't seem to understand what you have done wrong.
Let me spell it out:
" I know that r49463 only added INIT_FUNCTION to HAL, but I reverted both, just to be sure. I can get back ntoskrnl as they don't seem to be concerned."
ie:
"I know that my fix went beyond what was needed, but I did it anyway "just to be sure"".
ie:
"I know that A is impossible, yet I check for A anyway" -> logical fallacy
Next:
"- This has never be presented as a fix (but as a test)"
Yet your email said "this will not be reverted". A test, by definition, should be reverted. Again, logical failure.
Next:
> - Win32k INIT_FUNCTION is not defined for GCC (only for MSVC)
Strange, because Timo used objdump to let me know how big the .INIT section was. Maybe he was lying, I don't have information, so I'll pass.
Next:
> - Testbot is now stuck in ARM³ MM bugs
I can't seem to access builds.reactos.org to check, but I think this argument really nails it: you really don't get it (you don't get the scientific method).
You've just proven that the test samples are corrupted (ie: the compiler is broken), and now you expect me to hunt for bugs (ie: you expect me to analyze test results on samples that are now corrupted).
The answer is no, I will not fix "bugs" which might be due to a broken compiler. Fix the compiler, than I'll spend time hunting bugs.
> - You are away after breaking trunk (as usual)
How am I away? I've been posting to this mailing list, haven't I? I've been working on ARM porting, which, in case you don't know, is my job. I've posted screenshots of FreeLDR booting up on a real ARM board (I don't think you understand the complexity involved). I've almost got the keyboard working. The fringe benefits of C changes and new memory management code, which don't seem to be appreciate, are just bonuses out of the kindness of my heart, and they set back my port significantly. It was booting to user-mode with the old memory manager, now much of the work had to be restarted/refactored (obviously, it benefits the ARM port too, but I could've skipped this and done it the easy way).
My last 20 commits or so have ALL been bug fixes, and I still have more in the pipeline. I've fixed bugs that were more than 10 years old.
Don't ever question my commitment again.
> - Said "_Some_ people" include our testbot and some of our devs
That's _exactly the point_. You've obviously got a strange system/os/host/compiler issue going on, which is why it works for some, but not for others. I wasn't saying there isn't a problem, I was saying the problem is subtle and could be responsible for other subtle "bugs" as well. You're ignoring this, and forging ahead (with corrupted test samples). What is this, the movie Splice?
By your analysis, because GCC is broken, we should only use MSVC. I refuse to do so (and MSVC has its share of bugs). This "feature" is called PE sections. So you are saying GCC cannot/fails at generating PE sections. In other words, we can't use .data, .rsrc, .idata, etc anymore. In other words, the compiler is 100% broken and cannot be used. How do we know it's not failing because putting stuff in a different section doesn't somehow corrupt the code? Well, that means that it's also possible for code/data in .data, or in .idata to get corrupted in the exact same way. In other words, the compiler is broken and WE CAN'T TRUST ANYTHING.
Finally "> - Being mean won't fix anything".
Don't be a child. I was being harsh on your premise, to, I quote "not revert the commit", which implied that "well, the compiler is broken, but we'll just ignore that and assume there's no other side effects". Being "mean" is an entirely different emotion and outside the scope of the technical/professional communication I'm attempting to have with you. I am trying to educate/teach you. Being mean (and unprofessional) would've involved reverting your changes and calling you an idiot (I never once attacked you personally -- I called your decision braindead, that is different).
-r
> Hi,
>> I know that r49463 only added INIT_FUNCTION to HAL, but I reverted both, just to be sure. I can get back ntoskrnl as they don't seem to be concerned.
>> Now, on other remarks, considering that:
> - This has never be presented as a fix (but as a test)
> - Win32k INIT_FUNCTION is not defined for GCC (only for MSVC)
> - Testbot is now stuck in ARM³ MM bugs
> - You are away after breaking trunk (as usual)
> - Said "_Some_ people" include our testbot and some of our devs
> - Being mean won't fix anything
>> Only ntoskrnl will get its INIT_FUNCTIONS back.
> If GCC is broken, then we should only use that feature on MSVC, as it's done with win32k.
> If you are unhappy with such measures, keep in mind that you have commit access also for fixes.
>> Btw, www.itworksforme.com is a pretty bad reference.
>> Regards,
> P. Schweitzer
>> > Hi,
> >
> > Considering that:
> >
> > - The code to throw out INIT sections isn't in trunk, so _nothing happens_ when a function is made INIT or not.
> > - There were already many INIT functions in NTOSKRNL and the kernel worked fine
> > - 49463 only added INIT_FUNCTION to the HAL
> > - A later revision by Timo added INIT_FUNCTION to win32k, and that worked fine as well
> >
> > Don't you think it's a bit, pardon my language, braindead, to revert INIT_FUNCTION in NTOSKRNL, as your patch did? Wouldn't it make more sense to simply revert INIT_FUNCTION *just* in the HAL, which is what 49463 added? Why remove it from NTOSKRNL, where it always worked? Why _not_ remove it from Win32k, if you think INIT_FUNCTION is what's wrong? Your "fix" makes absolutely no logical sense from _any_ point of view (as usual).
> >
> > On a more serious note, don't you think it's strange that merely placing code in a section (which right now isn't dropped, or messed with, in any way), would cause problems in the OS? Isn't it immediately obvious to you that this is a red herring or that the compiler is broken? Especially since the revision only causes problems for _some_ people? For example, it works for me, and I even have a local change that _throw out_ init code.
> >
> > Please learn some basic rational logic methodologies, the scientific method, and software engineering processes.
> >
> > -r
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Ros-dev mailing list
> > Ros-dev at reactos.org
> > http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
>>>> _______________________________________________
> Ros-dev mailing list
> Ros-dev at reactos.org
> http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
More information about the Ros-dev
mailing list
CHAPTER VII. THE FOUR CLASSES OF SOCIETY. THE FOUR CLASSES OF SOCIETY. "After the herald had given the names of the wrestlers who were to make the first round, the fellows came in. They were dressed without any clothes to speak of, or rather they were quite undressed, with the exception of a cloth around their loins. They came in on opposite sides of the ring, and stood there about five feet apart, each man resting his hands on his knees, and glaring at the other like a wild beast. They[Pg 231] looked more like a pair of tigers than human beings, and for a moment I thought it was not at all unlike what a bull-fight in Spain might be. I turned upon her choking with anger, but her melting beauty rendered me helpless. Black woods were on our left. "Shall we turn in here?" I asked. "None of that with me," he growled. "Do you know who I am, Countess Lalage? I am Leon Lagage, Count of the Holy Roman Empire, and your husband. Incomparable woman, you cannot alter that fact. For better or worse, for richer or poorer, till death do us part!" I have in this way imperfectly indicated a methodical plan of generating a design, as far as words alone will serve, beginning with certain premises based upon a particular work to be performed, and then proceeding to consider in consecutive order the general character of the machine, mode of operation, movements and adjustments, general arrangement, strains, special arrangement, and proportions. ‘Alas! what is life, what is death, what are we, 11th January two best dresses. Commencement was as usual, with a few showers “All right,” agreed Sandy. “Dick, you and I are the ground crew. As soon as you’re ready, Mr. Whiteside, we’ll take hold!” Effects of Walpole's Administration—Formation of the new Ministry—Attitude of the Malcontents—Committee of Inquiry into Walpole's Administration—Walpole's Protectors—Ministerial Measures—Prorogation of Parliament—Disasters of the French—British Division in the Netherlands—Opening of Parliament—The German Mercenaries—Amendment of the Gin Act—George goes to Germany—Stair and De Noailles in Franconia—Stair in a Trap—Bold Resolution of King George—The Battle of Dettingen—Resignation of Stair—Retreat of the French—Negotiations for Peace—Treaty of Worms—Pelham becomes Prime Minister—The Attacks of Pitt on Carteret—Attempted Invasion of England—Its Failure—Progress of the French Arms—Frederick II. invades Bohemia—His Retirement—Resignation of Carteret—Pelham strengthens his Ministry—Death of the Emperor—Campaign in Flanders—Battle of Fontenoy—Campaign of Frederick II.—The Young Pretender's Preparations—Loss of the Elizabeth—Landing in the Hebrides—The Highland Clans join him—The First Brush—Raising of the Standard—Cope's Mistake—He turns aside at Dalwhinnie—Charles makes a Dash for Edinburgh—The March to Stirling—Right of the Dragoons—The "Canter of Coltbridge"—Edinburgh surprised by the Highlanders—Charles marching against Cope—Battle of Prestonpans—Delay in marching South—Discontent of the Highland Chiefs—The Start—Preparations in England—Apathy of the Aristocracy—Arrival of the Duke of Cumberland—Charles crosses the Border—Capture of Carlisle—The March to Derby—Resolution to retreat—"Black Friday"—The Retreat—Recapture of Carlisle—Siege of Stirling—Battle of Falkirk—Retreat to the Highlands—Cumberland's Pursuit—Gradual Collapse of the Highlanders—Battle of Culloden—Termination of the Rebellion—Cruelty of the Duke of Cumberland—Adventures of the Young Pretender—Trials and Executions—Ministerial Crisis. The next morning he was up betimes, and cooked the boys as good a breakfast as he could out of the remainder of his store and what he could get from the hospital, and then gave what was left to whoever came. The comfortable crib, which had cost the Deacon so much labor, had been pre-empted by the Surgeon for some of his weakest patients. "You two step forward one pace," he commanded. "Gentleman, I've got my six. The rest are yours." "Where are you goin'?" he said sternly. Every now and then the crowd would break into the latest rhymings of MacKinnon's poet: A large thicket, at this moment, gave the dusty foot an opportunity of doubling, and, for an instant, diverging from the straightforward course, though it availed him little, he seemed to feel the breath of his pursuer on the back of his neck; his foot sounded as if at his heels; he drew his garment closely around him, turned suddenly to the right, and, bounding from the ground, the next instant a splash was heard in the little river, and the fugitive was safe from his pursuer. HoME明日之后怎么免费刷一级纳米材料
ENTER NUMBET 0018www.esunda.com.cn fzzcw.com.cn www.yy586.com.cn b000.com.cn www.xqvi.com.cn dohonor.com.cn www.sylton.com.cn vils.com.cn www.yfmoney.com.cn www.minqing.org.cn